Want to get rid of Google Ads, click here.

View Poll Results: Should Peregrine implement support for MySQL as the backend RDBMS for ServiceCenter?

Voters
22. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    14 63.64%
  • No

    8 36.36%
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: MySQL for ServiceCenter ?

  1. #1
    Administrator tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    4,272

    Default MySQL for ServiceCenter ?

    Should Peregrine implement support for MySQL as the backend RDBMS for ServiceCenter?

    They are already implementing support for MySQL in Connect.It
    Best regards Tommy
    Blog - - ITIL certified - Accredited Integration Specialist – HP OpenView Service Management

    Want to keep this site alive? Consider making a donation. Click here.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Québec City
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: MySQL for ServiceCenter ?

    Quote Originally Posted by tommy
    Should Peregrine implement support for MySQL as the backend RDBMS for ServiceCenter?

    They are already implementing support for MySQL in Connect.It
    Well, I'd rather they do away with P4 altogether, and not just add facilities for dumping files to another DB.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    18

    Default

    I must agree, P4 is a pain in the a$$. SC is too pricy for small companies. And the companies that can afford Peregrine products already have a RDBMS in place that can be used.

  4. #4
    Administrator tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    4,272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alhowarth
    I must agree, P4 is a pain in the a$$. SC is too pricy for small companies. And the companies that can afford Peregrine products already have a RDBMS in place that can be used.
    True but if You want SC on a RDBMS on its own You have to buy new licenses. Even though IBM just cut the price on DB2 it is still expensive so MySQL is an alternative. End of this month we move to SC5 on Sun Solaris and when we next year want to use an external RDBMS we are looking at a pricetag of $30.000 for DB2 and $100.000 for Oracle.

    Of course MySQL has to be at a very stable and reliable level to be eligible but if MySQL was thrown into above equation I have no doubt that we would choose MySQL instead of DB2 because of the cost.
    Best regards Tommy
    Blog - - ITIL certified - Accredited Integration Specialist – HP OpenView Service Management

    Want to keep this site alive? Consider making a donation. Click here.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Tommy,

    I concur, MySQL sounds like the most cost-effective solution, although I don't have any experience with it myself.

    I can understand sticker-shock problems, as I would like to obtain more SC licenses and they are priced too high for today's budgets.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts